Hi all-

I felt this article was important enough to share.

Best Regards-
Sharon P.
Andaluz de Arion


NAIS vs. the Equine Owner
By R. M. Thornsberry, D.V.M., M.B.A.
Apr 15, 2009, 09:40

Email this article
<mailto:?subject=NAIS%20vs.%20the%20Equine%20Owner&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bridlea\
ndbit.com%2Fartman%2Fpublish%2Farticle_25128.shtml>
Printer friendly page
<http://www.bridleandbit.com/artman/publish/printer_25128.shtml>

Dr. R. M. Thornsberry, DVM, MBA, President of R-CALF USA

It is important for horse owners to know why NAIS is being forced on
the equine industry within the United States. The United States and many
other countries signed a World Trade Organization (WTO) treaty in the 1990's
which obligated the first world countries, which had spent literally
millions and millions of taxpayer dollars to eradicate contagious animal
diseases, to develop a system of individual animal identification. The
individual animal identification was demanded by the Organization of
International Epizootics (OIE), a WTO world wide governmental agency, tasked
with developing trade rules and internationally obligated trade regulations
that would force animal and meat trade between countries that had
eradicated contagious diseases with those that had not eradicated
contagious animal diseases. In other words, the United States, which had
eradicated Equine Piroplasmosis in the 1980's, a tick borne protozoal
infection, would, by identifying all equines, be forced to trade with
countries that had not eradicated Equine Piroplasmosis. In general, the
argument goes something like this: Once you can identify every equine at
birth and trace their every movement off the farm from birth to death, a
first world country that has
spent millions of taxpayer dollars to eradicate Equine Piroplasmosis,
can no longer prevent trade with those countries who have refused to
spend the necessary resources to eradicate Equine Piroplasmosis.

The United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) no longer seeks to carry out their mandate
to prevent the introduction of foreign animal and plant diseases into the
United States. Currently, USDA-APHIS in supporting NAIS, spending millions
of tax payer dollars to entice livestock and equine owners into the system
by promoting the acquisition of a free Premises Identification Number
(PIN)from their respective state departments of agriculture. Producers of
cattle, and equine owners, are the two classes of livestock owners who have
overwhelmingly refused to receive an internationally sanctioned encumbrance
to their private property. The USDA says a PIN is the first step to a
painless process of identification of all livestock owners' physical
locations, and that this PIN number is essential for the USDA to find a farm
and quickly trace the movement of animals in the face of a contagious animal
disease outbreak.

Yet, in any location within the state of Missouri, and I am sure in
most states, you can simply punch 911 into your phone, and in a matter of 15
to 20 minutes, the police, the fire department, the ambulance, the sheriff,
and usually the Conservation Commission Agent will be at your doorstep, but
the USDA says they cannot find you? At every Agricultural Services-USDA
office in the United States, you may obtain a description of your farm or
ranch, including a current aerial photograph. You can go on Google Earth,
type in your physical address, and privately obtain a detailed satellite
photograph of your farm or ranch, providing such detail, that you can
actually count individual cattle or horses in your pasture, and the USDA
says it cannot find your farm or ranch in a contagious animal disease
outbreak? The reasons the USDA want you to obtain a Premises Identification
Number have nothing whatever to do with the USDA's ability to find your farm
or your cattle or your horses. My 10 year old grandson can find my farm, a
detailed satellite photograph of my farm, my telephone number, my mailing
address, and my physical address on his computer in a matter of seconds.
It's called Google!!!

The USDA-APHIS has testified before the United States Department of
Agriculture, House of Representatives, Committee on Agriculture,
Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, March 11, 2009 that the NAIS
would have to be electronic in nature to function as envisioned by the WTO.
This simply means no visual tags, hot or cold brands, tattoos, ear notches,
or individual color markings or descriptions will be allowed for individual
animal identification. While this is a problem for other types of livestock,
for the equine industry, it becomes a major hurdle to overcome. For equines,
dogs, cats, fish, poultry, and many exotic animals, the only acceptable
means of electronic individual animal identification is a surgically
implanted glass enclosed electronic microchip. This implant is not nearly as
simple to surgically implant within an animal as some are led to believe.
When I implant a chip into an animal, I clip or shave the area. I scrub the
area with surgical preparation soap containing iodine, and I finish by
spraying the area with a surgical site disinfection iodine-alcohol solution.
Lastly, I inject the area over the site of implantation with lidocaine to
render the skin and underlying tissues devoid of sensation. The chips come
individually packaged in a sterile container. To maintain this sterility, I
must be sterile, which requires a surgical scrubbing of my hands, and the
donning of a pair of sterile surgical latex gloves. Only after this
extensive preparation, am I ready to actually implant the chip in the nuchal
ligament of the mid neck area of my equine patient. Compare this process to
the cattle producer who simply places a small eartag in his cattle.

The glass enclosed chips do not always stay put. Like a splinter in
your finger, the body often mounts a response to a foreign body, even one as
innocuous as a piece of sterile glass. The response may include the
formation of a sterile abscess around the chip, or it may simply be painful
and generate a negative response from the horse as it turns its neck or
tries to graze, or attempts a performance endeavor at a race, show, or
event. Chips have been known to migrate quite extensive distances within the
body of an animal. Ask any veterinarian that works in this area of interest.
Simply finding a chip to make a reading in some animals becomes a major
undertaking. Only recently, has another side effect of chipping become
known. A small percentage of veterinary patients have developed a cancerous
growth at the site of implantation. While the incidence is low in animals
whose lives are relatively short, an equine patient, living to the age of 20
to 35 years, has much more time to develop a cancerous growth around the
implanted chip, than does a dog or cat, whose lifetime is closer 12 to 15
years. For a very complete summary and analysis of the scientific literature
on microchips and cancer, see Katharine Albrecht, Ed.D., "Microchip Induced
Tumors in Laboratory Rodents and Dogs: A Review of the Literature, 1990 to
2006," available at www.antichips.com/cancer.

With all that being evaluated, the primary reason the USDA-APHIS
desires to force the NAIS system onto the livestock sectors of the United
States is simple: Bruce Knight told a large group of bovine practitioners at
our annual meeting in Vancouver, Canada in September 2007, when asked why
the USDA was pushing so hard for NAIS, and I quote, "It is quite simple.
We want to be in compliance with OIE regulations by 2010."

Now I don't know about all you equine owners, but we cattle producers
do not look kindly on an international agency in Belgium telling us what we
can and cannot do with our livestock in the United States. Our grandfathers
and fathers spend untold millions of dollars to assist the USDA in
eradicating many serious contagious animal diseases during the last 75
years. Why would we now acquiesce to a system that will open up our
privately owned animals to contagious animal diseases that we whipped and
wiped out many years ago, for access to our marketplace to animals and meat
from countries who have chosen in that same time period to ignore
eradication of contagious animal diseases? No way!!!

We live in the United States, not the WTO. We have a Constitution
that directs our legal system, not the OIE. We have a government by the
people, for the people, and of the people. It is time for the people to
stand up and say, "Enough with the one world government junk!!!" If equine
owners do not stand up and unite their voices with other livestock
producers, NAIS will become mandatory in the United States. It will cost
the equine owner in excess of $50.00 a head to implant the electronic
microchip desired by the USDA and the WTO. You will then be required to
report any movement of your horse or horses off your property, and for any
reason. Imagine the bureaucratic nightmare and the paperwork requirements
of reporting to your government every time you go on a trail ride, every
time you go to a show or an event, and every time you trailer a mare to go
to the stud. There will have to be an NAIS office in every county seat to
process all this data, keep track of your information, and report any
violations to the USDA. Just imagine the fines and enforcement actions that
will be carried out to enforce this NAIS system on the livestock industry of
the United States of America, including equine owners.

R. M. Thornsberry, D.V.M., M.B.A.
March 28, 2009


--------------------------------------------------------------------------



Max Thornsberry, D.V.M., is R-CALF USA's President of the Board of
Directors. Thornsberry and his wife Brenda reside in Richland, Mo. He is the
owner and manager of TNT Cattle Co., as well as Avanco Feeds.

Thornsberry has a B.S. in Agriculture and a minor in Chemistry from
the University of Missouri's College of Agriculture. In 1977, Thornsberry
received his D.V.M. from University of Missouri's College of Veterinary
Medicine. In 1992, Thornsberry acquired his M.B.A. at California Coast
University in Santa Ana, Calif.

Thornsberry is a past president of both the Missouri Stockgrower's
Association and the Missouri Cattlemen's Association. He also is a current
member of the Academy of Veterinary Consultants and the American Veterinary
Medical Association.