Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
tortoiseshellsociety · TORTOISE SHELL SOCIETY - Turtle Tales,myths,legends,fables,news&clues
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Is Greenpeace NGO backed up by Science or emotion?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #2068 of 2088 |
It seems that Greenpeace and other environmental organizations have a habit
making unscientific demands without any scientific datas and inputs. This is
clear from the position with regard to Dhamra Port. These organizations who
claim themselves to work for environmental protection work more on emotional
basis rather than on clear scientific reasoning and logic. On the request of
Dhamra Port Company Ltd (DPCL), L&T and Tata Steel, two of them namely BNHS and
WWF initially agreed to do further environmental studies on Dhamra port way back
in 2005, but withdrew in the last minute. Due to the delaying tactics by the
said organization the construction of Dhamra port was stopped for them for the
period from Nov 2005 to March 2006. But inspite of the stoppage of the work at
Dhamra, both BNHS and WWF withdrew from making further environmental studies on
Dhamra Port.
Similarly after discussions between both the environmental NGOs and Dhamra Port
developers, additional study was agreed upon in Dec 2008 to assess Biological
Impact by Dhamra Port. The study was supposed to be conducted by mutually agreed
upon scientists. The promoters agreed upon for further studies inspite of
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) – the world's most
renowned scientific organisation being already involved in the study in Dhamra
since last 2 years.
But similar to last time ( that in 2005), these organizations led by Greenpeace
once again demanded to stop construction of Dhamra Port immediately in February
2009. This demand has no scientific back-up or inputs and was purely made on
emotional basis and it does not have scientific recommendation. However DPCL,
Tata Steel and L&T team showed it preparedness to adjust the schedule of works
including dredging to facilitate the study after due recommendation by the
Scientists team.
It may be noted that IUCN and the MTSG (Marine Turtle Scientific Group)
scientists working with the group have clearly stated that dredging operations
for Dhamra does not and will not affect the Olive Ridley Turtles in Gahirmatha
Marine Sanctuary and its periphery area.




Tue Apr 14, 2009 5:56 pm

k_shiva43
Offline Offline

Forward
Message #2068 of 2088 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

It seems that Greenpeace and other environmental organizations have a habit making unscientific demands without any scientific datas and inputs. This is clear...
k_shiva43
Offline
Apr 16, 2009
3:02 pm

It seems that Greenpeace and other environmental organizations have a habit making unscientific demands without any scientific datas and inputs. This is clear...
k_shiva43
Offline
Apr 23, 2009
7:53 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help